Tufts College Library
FROM THE INCOME OF THE
Shipman Memorial Fund
Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016
Sciopin tTiAC-ennii. TIo'dUaij 1916.
Ethical Treatises
BEING THE TREATISES OF
THE FIRST ENNEAD WITH
PORPHYRY’S LIFE OF
Lotinus: the
PLOTINUS, AND THE PRELLER-RITTER
EXTRACTS FORMING A CONSPECTUS OF
THE PLOTINIAN SYSTEM, TRANSLATED
FROM THE GREEK BY STEPHEN MACKENNA
CHARLES T. BRANFORD COMPANY BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
,M-b
v.l
Contents
I'AQP.
Porphyry’s Life of Plotinus ....... i
The Books of the First Ennead
I. The Animate and the Man . . . . . .29
II. On Virtue . . . . . . • 41
III. Dialectic (or The Upward Way) . . . . -.50
IV. On Happiness (or The Authentic Good of Life) . . ■
V. On Happiness and Extension of Time . . . . -72
VI. On Beauty . . . . . . *77
VII. On the Primal Good and its Secondary Forms . . .89
VIII. On Evil, Its Nature and Source . . . . .92
IX. On “The Reasoned Dismissal” ...... 108
Bibliography and Explanatory Matter
Text, Previous Tr.\nslations . . . . . . -113
Method of this Translation . . . . . . .114
Commentaries ......... 116
Terminology ......... 117
The Divine Names ........ 118
The One .......... n8
The Intellectual-Principle ....... 119
The All-Soul ......... 120
The Divine-Triad as a Unity ....... 120
The Gods and Daimones ....... 121
Man ; His Nature, Powers and Destiny ..... 121 •
Evil and Matter ........ 123
Morality ......... 123
The Term and the Way ....... 124
Minor Points of Terminology ....... 124
The Preller-Ritter Conspectus of the Plotinian System
I. The Fall of the Souls and Their Return .... 130
Free-Will ........ 131
II. The Grandeur of the Soul ...... 131
All Souls as One Soul ....... 132
III. The Soul in Relation to the Intellectual-Principle. . . 134
8 Plotinus
I'aor
Emanation, Its Nature and Mode ..... 135
Matter in the Divine Sphere . . . . . . 135
IV. The Intellectual-Principle in Relation to the One . . 136
The Categories of the Divine ..... 137
Reasoning and Intellection ...... 137
Identity of Divine Mind and Divine Thoughts . . . 138
The Act of the Intellectual-Principle and of the Soul . . 139
Universal Contemplation ...... 139
V. The Origin of Multiplicity ...... 140
The Need of the One Transcending the Multiple . . 140
VI. The Absolute Transcendency of the One .... 141
The One Stated only by Negation ..... 141
VII. Why the Supreme is a Triad ...... 143
The Soul’s Intellective-Nature ..... 144
The Ideas in the Intellectual-Principle and in Soul . . 144
The Presence of the One in the Lower Existents . . 145
VIII. The Soul and the World of Nature .... 146
Fall of the Soul ....... 147
IX. Matter ......... 148
X. Soul and Body ........ 148
Eternity of the World ^ ..... . 149
Fall of the Soul Denied ...... 150
Evil and Ugliness ....... 150
The World Animated ....... 150
Prayer and Magic ....... 151
Temples and Statues ....... 151
XI. How Souls Take Body ....... 152
Fall of the Soul ....... 152
Gods and Daimones ....... 152
Astrology . . . . . . . • i53
Celestial Man ........ 153
XII. The Soul after Death . . . . . • i53
Body is in Soul, not Soul in Body ..... 153
Sensation and the True Man ...... 154
Virtue and Vice ....... 154
The Drama of Life ....... 154
XIII. Likeness to God ....... 155
Purification and Perfection ...... 155
XIV. The Vision of the Supreme ...... 156
Conspectus of the Plotinian System
THE PRELLER-RITTER EXTRACTS FORMING A CONSPECTUS OF THE PLOTINIAN SYSTEM
The translator had written copious notes with reference to many passages of the Enneads when, at last and just in time, he saw that the method of particular explan- ation would lead inevitably to endless repetition with not a little final ambiguity. In a good translation no single passage should be difficult to anyone having a firm grasp of the Neo-Platonic system.
After the study of the general exposition given under the heading “ Termin- ology,” the novice will find the first difficulties wonderfully cleared by the reading of the passages selected by Preller and Ritter as embodying the main substance of the doctrine.
Since all this matter will appear, elaborately worked, in its proper place in the course of this complete rendering of the Enneads now beginning to appear, it has been judged sufficient for the immediate purpose to translate these Preller-Ritter extracts in somewhat rough-and-ready fashion ; they, too, serve as a chart, merely.
The edition used is “ Historia Philosophies Grceccs et Romanes ex Fontium Locis contexta. . . . H. Ritter et L. Preller. . . . Gothae, 1864.” Where the compilers had presented a flagrantly vicious text, the emendations of Volkmann have been adopted.
The Notes following each of the fourteen main extracts and embodying other extracts, are also the work of Preller and Ritter. In translation some explosions of mere learning have been suppressed and some more substantial passages, too — these last where the translator, having taken up Plotinus’ text earlier or carried it further than the compilers, found that their remarks or illustrations had become superfluous. The compilers have occasionally caught too quickly at the first apparent meaning of a passage without sufficient study of its context — a common fault in citation from the Enneads — and the notes sometimes state very bluntly matters calling for very fine distinction : the translator has sometimes judged well to vary their phrasing to meet such cases, sometimes has left the errors to be tran- quilly corrected by the evidence the compilers themselves furnish.
Whatever fault may be found with the compilers or with their hasty translator, it will remain the fact that to know this Preller-Ritter Conspectus through and
through is to have present to the mind a very useful and nearly adequate com- pendium of the system.
The Fall of the Souls : Their Return
V. 3, 9. What can be the cause that has led the souls to forget God, their Father, and, members of Him though they are, wholly His, to cease to know both themselves and Him ?
The evil that has befallen them is due to a Rebellious Audacity (n) to their entry into birth (or their desire to " become ”) to the Primal Differentiation (n) and to the desire of the souls to have similarly a life of their own.
They began to revel in free-will (n) ; they indulged their own movement : they took the wrong path : they went far astray (n) : thus it was that they lost the knowledge that they sprang of that Divine Order (were members of the Triune). . . . They no longer had a true vision of The Supreme or of themselves : they dis- honoured themselves by honouring the Alien in forgetfulness of their Race, by admiring all things rather than themselves. Smitten with longing for the Lower, rapt in love for it, they grew to depend upon it : so they broke away, as far as was in their power, and came to slight the lofty sphere they had abandoned. . . Nothing that so humbles itself to things that rise and perish, making itself pettier and less enduring than what it honours, nothing such can ever keep in mind the nature of God or His power.
Two appeals must be made to those that have thus fallen if they are to be set again towards the High and towards The Primals and led up to the Supreme, to the One and First.
One method exhibits to the soul the shame of the things which it now honours — of this we will treat later — the second appeal . . . leads the other and conveys it with clear conviction ; it is to teach the soul, or to remind it, of its lofty race and rank.
Notes
Rebellious-Audacity : — This word, tolma, — is used elsewhere in the same sense, that is to indicate the motive leading the soul, from the beginning, to desert its First Principle.
In Theologumena Arithmetica, we read, ” The first Dyad separated itself from the Monad in what is called an act of rebellion or self-assertion, a tolma.”
PORPHYRY: ON THE LIFE OF PLOTINUS AND THE ARRANGEMENT OF HIS WORK
(Plotinus born A.D. 205 in Egypt, at Lycopolis according to Eunapius, died near Rome A.D. 270.)
Plotinus, the philosopher our contemporary, seemed ashamed of being in the body.
So deeply-rooted was this feeling that he could never be induced to tell of his ancestry, his parentage or his birthplace.
He showed, too, an unconquerable reluctance to sit to a painter or a sculptor, and when Auielius persisted in urging him to allow of a portrait being made he asked him, “ Is it not enough to carry about this image in which nature has enclosed us ? Do you really think I must also consent to leave, as a desirable spectacle to posterity, an image of the image ? ”
In view of this determined refusal Amelius brought his friend Carterius, the best artist of the day, to the Conferences, which were open to every comer, and saw to it that by long observation of the philosopher he caught his most striking personal traits. From the impressions thus stored in mind the artist drew a first sketch ; Amelius made various suggestions towards bringing out the resemblance, and in this way, with- out the knowledge of Plotinus, the genius of Carterius gave us a life-like portrait.
Plotinus was often distressed by an intestinal complaint, but declined clysters, pronouncing the use of such remedies unbecoming in an elderly man : in the same way he refused such medicaments as con-
tain any substance taken from wild beasts or reptiles ; all the more, he remarked, since he could not approve of eating the flesh of animals reared for the table.
He abstained from the use of the bath, contenting himself with a daily massage at home : when the terrible epidemic carried off his masseurs he renounced all such treatment ; in a short while he con- tracted malign diphtheria.
During the time I was about him there was no sign of any such malady, but after I sailed for Sicily the condition grew acute : his inti- mate, Eustochius, who was with him till his death, told me, on my return to Rome, that he became hoarse, so that his voice quite lost its clear sonorous note, his sight grew dim and ulcers formed on his hands and feet.
As he still insisted on addressing everyone by word of mouth, his condition prompted his friends to withdraw from his society : he there- fore left Rome for Campania, retiring to a property which had belonged to Zethos, an old friend of his at this time dead. His wants were pro- vided in part out of Zethos' estate, and for the rest were furnished from Mintumae, where Castricius’ property lay.
Of Plotinus’ last moments Eustochius has given me an account.
He himself was staying at Puteoli and was late in arriving : when he at last came, Plotinus said : “ I have been a long time waiting for you ; I am striving to give back the Divine in myself to the Divine in the All.” As he spoke a snake crept under the bed on which he lay and slipped away into a hole in the wall : at the same moment Plotinus died.
This was at the end of the second year of the reign of Claudius, and, as Eustochius tells me, Plotinus was then sixty-six. I myself was at Lilybaeum at the time, Amelius at Apamea in Syria, Castricius at Rome ; only Eustochius was by his side.
Counting sixty-six years back from the second year of Claudius, we can fix Plotinus’ birth at the thirteenth year of Severus ; but he never disclosed the month or day. This was because he did not desire any birthday sacrifice or feast ; yet he himself sacrificed on the traditional birthdays of Plato and of Socrates, afterwards giving a banquet at which
every member of the circle who was able was expected to deliver an address.
Despite his general reluctance to talk of his own life, some few details he did often relate to us in the course of conversation.
Thus he told how, at the age of eight, when he was already going to school, he still clung about his nurse and loved to bare her breasts and take suck : one day he was told he was a “ perverted imp,” and so was shamed out of the trick.